Skip to content
Thursday, October 15, 2026
Openly Memo is a personal blog where the author shares insi…

Tetris Couldn't Triumph at This Gaming Ceremony — Another Award Type May Address This Issue

Each time a major prize-giving event draws close, one notices an outcry for introducing of new categories to honor unsung work and satisfy the spirits of followers dedicated to specific genres.

A fellow writer made the case supporting a scary games classification. That would be fantastic. So would tabletop games, which is a passionate advocate's mission. Yet I need to apologize in advance for pushing forward just as with other blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand stands as crucial above others. This is the request: There should be a classification for brain-teasing titles.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Organizing artistic expressions is not a science; opinions vary greatly, and typically generate discussions resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why cinema institutions avoid this approach. But it is an essential concession within the realm of gaming, showing incredible range they barely qualify as a single art form.

For the full spectrum of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, and for games of all stripes to receive proper recognition, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards presently include genre categories for Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Collectively, these award types successfully include numerous genres, making space possible accommodating various experiences.

Different situation exists for brain-teasing titles. No suitable classification appears to put them. Examine these examples from this year’s best games, all very different: building puzzles of one title, the pulse-pounding block-matching in a different title, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles from additional release. Which classification works within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

Recognition Challenges

There are dozens of brilliant puzzle games published annually that have no home at major award shows, except when they manage to fit for categories like Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging Indie races.

  • An iconic brain-teaser received no recognition for anything that year
  • Another imaginative release missed out during that ceremony
  • Popular arranging title was overlooked recently
  • Limited numbers of logic titles barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications

Significance of Puzzle Games

These are often small games, however the design in brain-teasers is of massive significance. Famous handheld logic titles stand as most popular titles in the world continuing this trend for over a decade.

The legendary block-stacking game competes with popular creative games for the title of best-selling game of all time; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, while interacting across multiple categories.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. It would be easy to populate five nominees interesting, varied, worthy titles each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

Restating the point, these are games without proper classification during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers are working at the challenging frontier interactive creation, producing among most fundamental forms of gaming itself. Just like cinema stunt performers, they warrant appreciation. Let’s not keep them waiting decades.

Written by

Stacey Wilson

A writer and thinker passionate about storytelling, technology, and human connection, with a background in digital media.

Openly Memo

Type to search articles.